Nukes and hypocrasy
Has anyone ever thought about how the US is always trying to regulate who can have nukes and who can't. Isn't this rather hypocritical. Aren't all the other countries saying, "hey if you guys get to have nuclear missiles, then why can't we?". Which makes alot of sense. Why isn't the US setting the example for other countries by disarming their nuclear warheads? Obviously this would leave the US open to attack, and is very risky. But a good show of faith on the US's part wouldn't be bad and may produce some good results in other countries disarming.
just a thought I had today...
just a thought I had today...
posted by The Pawn at 9:08 PM
3 Comments:
I came across your blog by chance. Interesting points of view. There is, indeed, much hypocrisy concerning nuclear weapons, and others. (For just one example, remember the photo of Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein a few years ago when the US concluded a big arms sale agreement with him. )
But the rest of the world does contain people who would walk right in and take us over if they thought they could. So disarming our own nation would not only be risky, it would be foolish and suicidal.
The time may come when even our nuclear arsenal won't stop the have-nots of the world from inundating our land, sweeping right through the gated communities of the wealthy as they go.
It gets complex.
The situation is very complex indeed.
It's just a shame that this is the way things are in the world. Can't we all just get along?
No. The French tried to "get along" with the Germans, and we saw how that turned out! USAUSAUSAUSA!
I had fun with that.
Post a Comment
<< Home